Crossbook
live

Will Darline Graham Nordone win Lexington County in the South Carolina Special Senate Primary runoff?

Crossbook compares what two exchanges, Polymarket and Kalshi, charge for the same event, and publishes a permanent scored record of its own forecasts under published rules.

Tracked on one venue, with Crossbook's own call on the record.

SettledContract settles 25 Aug 2026Last checked 25 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC
PM

Bid/ask midpoint · retrieved 2026-08-25T23:55:07.138Z. Venue quote-update time is unavailable. Readings can be asynchronous.

96.2%bid 93.4% / ask 98.9%24h volume $1K · liquidity $2Kas of 25 Aug, 23:55 UTC · not refreshed recentlyView on Polymarket

Crossbook forecast

92.0%against a market price of 95.0% at the timeYES

Logged 23 Aug 2026, 02:25 UTC · Brier 0.0064

  • Reference class: county-level outcomes in state legislative special primaries are highly predictable when the candidate is locally rooted or won the county in the first round; upsets at the county level are rare even when the overall race is competitive.
  • Inside view is thin for me: I lack verified specifics on this race (first-round county results, endorsements, turnout patterns), so I cannot justify deviating far from the reference class; the Graham name and any local base in Lexington County would be genuine signal if applicable, not just narrative.
  • The market's 95% with 3 days to go is plausible given traders in hyper-niche political markets often have access to first-round county data and local reporting I don't have; my slightly lower estimate reflects my informational disadvantage rather than a strong contrary view.
  • Low 24h volume ($5.5k) means the price could be stale or set by a few informed traders, which argues for shading toward, not away from, the market rather than treating the divergence as an opportunity.

What would change it: Release of first-round results or local reporting showing Graham Nordone lost Lexington County badly in the initial primary, or that her runoff opponent is the Lexington County native with consolidated local endorsements, would drop this to near or below 50%.

Settlement source

-3.0 probability points from the market at generation · low confidence · Polymarket

Base rate: In low-turnout special primary runoffs, a candidate with strong local ties or a first-round lead wins their home/best county roughly 85–95% of the time.

Chosen by hand.

Settlement

Every answer this call has been given, oldest first. Nothing is edited: a correction is a new entry beside the one it replaces.

  1. YESsettled 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · recorded 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · entered by handsettlement

  2. REOPENEDreopened · recorded 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · entered by hand

  3. YESsettled 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · recorded 26 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC · entered by handsettlement

  4. YESsettled 27 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC · recorded 5 Oct 2026, 01:23 UTC · read from the venuesettlement

    Corrected against Polymarket's settlement. It was recorded as settled on 26 Aug 2026, before Polymarket settled it on 27 Aug 2026.

Context

Polymarket prices this at 96.2%. No verified equivalent is currently listed on the other venue, so there is no cross venue comparison on this page.

Volume over the last 24 hours is thin, at about $1,423 on the busier venue.

This market has settled. The page is kept as a record of what the market said while the question was open, and of what Crossbook called.

Related markets

Crossbook publishes every forecast it makes, timestamped before the answer is known and scored against the market afterwards. See the public record and the rules it is held to.

This call is line t-0043 of the public append-only ledger, committed when it was published. It appears on the record alongside every other call, resolved and open.